Yes, it’s true: the latest research indicates that reading material in print rather than in an electronic reader is better for you in the following ways:
- Increased comprehension. The tactile experience of reading a printed book actually matters. Check out the research.
- Related to the above, we’re more likely to read every line of printed material. When we read e-books, we tend to read the first line and then just the words near the beginning of the line after that.
- We lose the ability to engage in linear reading if we don’t do it often.
- Reading printed material for about an hour before bedtime helps us sleep. Reading ebooks keeps us awake.
I read both e-books and print books, and I’m grateful for my e-readers (really, the apps on my iPad) when I’m traveling. It’s easier to carry 1000 books on one iPad than it is to carry five in a backpack.
But I know what the researchers mean by the tactile elements of memory, the feeling of better control over your media with pages, etc. I do remember where to find things in books by their physical location in the book, which isn’t possible with an e-reader: you can only search terms and page numbers. I think the point here isn’t which search method is more efficient, but which reading style engages more of the brain by engaging more of our physical senses.
I’d like you to consider a few things about the way we developed our technologies:
- The people who developed our technologies didn’t have our technologies. In other words, the people who built the first computer didn’t have computers.
- The engineers who landed men on the moon did most of their work on slide rules.
- The computers that they did use had less computing power than our telephones.